J. Loeb
To Win
M. Sieg
To Win
Monica Niculescu vs Jamie Loeb Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W L W W
Form
L W W W W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Niculescu 1 - 0 Loeb
They have played 2 sets in total, with Niculescu winning 2 and Loeb winning 0. The last match between Niculescu and Loeb was at the W100+H Nottingham, 13-06-2021, Q1 round, Grass with Monica Niculescu getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Monica Niculescu | 1 |
| Jamie Loeb | 0 |
W100+H Nottingham(13-06-2021)
6
2
7
5
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Osaka VS Bronzetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Monica Niculescu
Player
Jamie Loeb
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:45:0 | Average Match Time | 1:45:0 |
| 79% (50/63) | 1st Serve % | 61% (59/96) |
| 66% (33/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (32/59) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (16/37) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 50% (48/96) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Monica Niculescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Katrina Scott
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Emily Webley-Smith
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Monica Niculescu
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Samantha Murray
77%
(
77 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Maddison Inglis
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Monica Niculescu
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
86%
(
51 of
59)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Kristie Ahn
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Asia Muhammad
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Jamie Loeb
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Malaika Rapolu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Karina Miller
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Jamie Loeb
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
0
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Maria Mateas
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Madison Sieg
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Rhiann Newborn
44%
(
27 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Jamie Loeb
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (475/354) | Win/Loss | 54% (321/272) |
| 57% (1091/830) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (732/636) |
| 53% (9260/8066) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6430/6098) |
| 57% (223/167) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (188/142) |
| 56% (123/95) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (89/80) |
| 61% (96/62) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (36/33) |
| 52% (33/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 32% (8/17) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 541 | Aces Total | 1456 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1068 | Total Double Faults | 1702 |
| 1:2:2 | Average Match Time | 1:18:9 |
| 478.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 498.92 |
| 73% (29793/40616) | 1st Serve % | 54% (17241/31954) |
| 57% (17068/29793) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (11186/17241) |
| 45% (4870/10822) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6778/14712) |
| 50% (2816/5656) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1741/3711) |
| 48% (19729/41227) | Return Points Win % | 44% (14225/32599) |
| 49% (55/57) | Slam W/L | 46% (16/19) |
| 51% (85/81) | Masters W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 60% (9/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (158/135) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (23/31) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (154/71) | Challenger W/L | 54% (252/214) |
| 78% (14/4) | Futures W/L | 90% (27/3) |
| 58% (468/812) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (317/587) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 51% (75/148) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (54/118) |
| 47% (127/271) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (91/182) |
| 81% (497/404) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (340/284) |
| 18% (497/90) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (340/55) |
| 21% (331/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (253/37) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
